Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 51(4): 151-157, 2023. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-222645

RESUMO

Background and aim: Bronchial asthma is a prevalent type of respiratory disease that affects a large proportion of pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the clinical effects of budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in treating bronchial asthma. Methods: Eighty-six children with bronchial asthma were equally divided into study and control groups via randomized double-blind controlled trial. The control group was treated with aerosol inhalation of budesonide combined with placebo, while the study group was treated with budesonide combined with montelukast sodium. Pulmonary function parameters, immunoglobulin, and recovery of related symptoms, along with the adverse reaction rate, were observed and compared between both groups. Results: Before treatment, there was no marked difference in pulmonary function parameters and immunoglobulin indexes between both groups (P > 0.05). All pulmonary function indicators and immunoglobulin indexes in both groups improved following therapy, with the study group outperforming the control group (P < 0.05). The recovery time of related symptoms in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was compared, with notable differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in the treatment of bronchial asthma has the value of clinical application and promotion (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoglobulinas/sangue , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/administração & dosagem , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A2/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 68(6): 928-35, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20002088

RESUMO

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Numerous cocktails using concurrent administration of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform-selective probe drugs have been reported to investigate drug-drug interactions in vivo. * This approach has several advantages: characterize the inhibitory or induction potential of compounds in development toward the CYP enzymes identified in vitro in an in vivo situation, assess several enzymes in the same trial, and have complete in vivo information about potential CYP-based drug interactions. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This study describes a new cocktail containing five probe drugs that has never been published. * This cocktail can be used to test the effects of a new chemical entity on multiple CYP isoforms in a single clinical study: CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (metoprolol), and CYP3A (midazolam) and was designed to overcome potential liabilities of other reported cocktails. AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of selective substrates of CYP1A2 (caffeine), CYP2C9 (S-warfarin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), CYP2D6 (metoprolol) and CYP3A (midazolam) when administered orally and concurrently as a cocktail relative to the drugs administered alone. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-dose, randomized, six-treatment six-period six-sequence William's design study with a wash-out of 7 or 14 days. Thirty healthy male subjects received 100 mg caffeine, 100 mg metoprolol, 0.03 mg kg(-1) midazolam, 20 mg omeprazole and 10 mg warfarin individually and in combination (cocktail). Poor metabolizers of CYP2C9, 2C19 and 2D6 were excluded. Plasma samples were obtained up to 48 h for caffeine, metoprolol and omeprazole, 12 h for midazolam, 312 h for warfarin and the cocktail. Three different validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods were used. Noncompartmental PK parameters were calculated. Log-transformed C(max), AUC(last) and AUC for each analyte were analysed with a linear mixed effects model with fixed term for treatment, sequence and period, and random term for subject within sequence. Point estimates (90% CI) for treatment ratios (individual/cocktail) were computed for each analyte C(max), AUC(last) and AUC. RESULTS: There was no PK interaction between the probe drugs when administered in combination as a cocktail, relative to the probes administered alone, as the 90% CI of the PK parameters was within the prespecified bioequivalence limits of 0.80, 1.25. CONCLUSION: The lack of interaction between probes indicates that this cocktail could be used to evaluate the potential for multiple drug-drug interactions in vivo.


Assuntos
Cafeína/farmacocinética , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A2/farmacocinética , Midazolam/farmacocinética , Omeprazol/farmacocinética , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Ansiolíticos/administração & dosagem , Ansiolíticos/farmacocinética , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem , Antiulcerosos/farmacocinética , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/farmacocinética , Área Sob a Curva , Cafeína/administração & dosagem , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/administração & dosagem , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/farmacocinética , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A2/administração & dosagem , Combinação de Medicamentos , Interações Medicamentosas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...